No results for ‘红板科技 2026年3月 订单公告’

The Social, Cooperative and Community Economy All-Party Parliamentary Group (APPG) convened last week to hear from social enterprise leaders on the government's defining mission: growth. They made the case that growth without community at its heart is growth that fails most people. Growth has been the buzzword of the Labour government since it was elected, but there's a stark difference between growth that widens inequality and 'good growth' that delivers better living standards for everyone. Social enterprise leaders came to Westminster to tell Patrick Hurley MP that their sector is not just part of the answer; it is often ahead of where government policy currently sits. The social enterprise economy in action Gareth Hart, Director of the Plymouth Social Enterprise Network, offered some striking numbers. Plymouth is home to 250 social enterprises, representing 10,000 jobs and around £650 million a year, roughly 20% of the local economy. The city has catalysed £15 million of social investment, seen measurable improvements in the Index of Multiple Deprivation, and been recognised by PwC as one of the best cities for living and working. But Hart was equally clear about what is still needed: access to finance, advice and training, markets, and much better support with impact reporting. The social enterprise infrastructure, he warned, is fragile and needs sustained investment and better policy at both local and national level. More than GDP One of the meeting's most striking statements came from Social Enterprise Coalition Group CEO Peter Holbrook, who challenged the very framing of growth as a measure of national progress. Pointing to the Joint Intelligence Committee's 2026 report on threats including water scarcity, conflict and migration, he argued that social enterprises don't just deliver growth: they deliver security and resilience. Decentralised, community-rooted organisations, he said, have proven their capacity to adapt in a crisis, as COVID made plain. "Social enterprises aren't just delivering resilience and security and growth," said Holbrook, "they're also creating opportunities for communities to come together, build relationships and become self-determining." A narrow focus on GDP figures, he warned, obscures the full value of what the sector contributes. Liverpool's blueprint Jennifer Van der Merwe, Executive Director of Kindred in the Liverpool City Region (and now also seconded as a Place Advisor to the Office for the Impact Economy) described a model others might learn from. Liverpool's ten-year local growth plan has inclusive growth at its core, she told the room. Kindred is scaling its social investment from £6.5 million to around £50 million, working with eight infrastructure organisations across the city region. Since 2020, its membership of socially trading organisations has grown from 150 to 1,600. Central to the approach is the concept of social and financial innovation zones — placing social economy thinking at the heart of industrial clusters in sectors like advanced manufacturing and health sciences that wouldn't traditionally associate themselves with social enterprise. As Van der Merwe put it: "You're either a social business or you're an antisocial business. It's not what your governance structure is; what are your behaviours?" What's blocking progress Duncan Howard of ECT Charity put his finger on a persistent frustration: the Social Value Act is not being followed by local authorities. ECT moves people where the market won't, getting children to school and older people into town, connecting communities. That social value isn't being factored into contracting decisions, leaving community transport operators to deliver subsidised services ... but without any subsidy. Community asset transfer was another flashpoint. Birgit Kehrer of ChangeKitchen CIC in Birmingham described the local picture as a near-failure with the responsible part of the council near enough blocking transfers, and assets being sold off to developers for a fraction of their value.  Central government, the room agreed, needs to issue clear guidance and hold local authorities to account. What needs to happen Several concrete proposals emerged. Van der Merwe called for capital to be redesigned and devolved to place. Kehrer argued for longer-term funding settlements and better support for apprenticeships within social enterprises. Holbrook suggested aligning local authority pension fund incentives with local investment opportunities, and asked government to match the sector's ambition in its own language and leadership. Gareth Hart's suggestion drew immediate recognition from the chair: social enterprise economic development zones, where CIC startups receive corporation tax exemptions and business rate relief, and CICs are brought into line with charities for policy purposes. "There are no new ideas under the sun," Patrick Hurley acknowledged, citing a twenty-year-old pamphlet he still had on social enterprise zones. "But it's a good idea. We should do it." The Social, Cooperative and Community Economy holds regular evidence sessions with practitioners, investors and policymakers.

Several social enterprise leaders recently met with government to share how they could be supported to create more jobs President Trump’s invasion of Iran and the associated financial tremors aren’t making it easy currently, but economic growth remains the government’s priority. Key to that will be a more resilient labour market, one that delivers secure, quality employment, supports career progression and includes those furthest from work. Despite facing challenges, social enterprises are experts in this field, so sector leaders recently met with Patrick Hurley MP to give evidence of how they could contribute to economic growth in this way. Evidence has shown that social enterprises are significantly more likely to employ people from disadvantaged groups and operate in left-behind communities, providing holistic employment support. They contribute to higher workforce stability and retention, improved wellbeing and productivity, and help reduce long-term pressure on welfare and public services. Yet it’s far from plain sailing. Leaders told Hurley of the difficulties they face, including short-term, cost-driven commissioning, barriers to accessing public contracts and the labour intensive (and potentially fruitless) work of applying for grants. Their experiences painted a vivid picture of what social enterprises can achieve, but also of the systemic failings holding them back. Opening the door to employment "We are set up to employ people that no one else will," said Half the Story founder Matt Parfitt, describing the ethos of his biscuit business. "We try to lower the bar for access, but only as a stepping stone to higher-value jobs. It's the holistic support - the culture, the coaching, English lessons for refugees, help with finances or housing - that changes lives, not just the job itself." Half the Story is now planning to replicate its bakery model in ten locations, proof that purpose-driven business can scale, without permanent subsidy. The business is philanthropically seed funded. Lucy Ferguson of Mediorite, a 15-year-old video production company, was candid about the pressures her organisation faces. "It has never been harder to operate as a social enterprise," she said. "The demand is growing, but how do you remain sustainable when fighting for funding against other charities and fighting commercial businesses for work?" Ferguson also highlighted an unpaid burden many social enterprises carry: "We are filling gaps between schools, the DWP, and the commercial sector, but we aren't getting paid for that extra support work." With labour costs rising and tenders coming in below market rate, Ferguson warned of a sector reduced to "fighting each other for crumbs left by the commercial sector." Armeena Athwal of Breakthrough echoed the frustration. Supporting ex-offenders and people with mental health issues requires intensive one-to-one coaching, yet commissioning often rewards the lowest bid. A recent three-day Ofsted inspection, "like being investigated by the police," she said illustrated the disproportionate scrutiny placed on those doing the hardest work with the most vulnerable people. How the government can support social enterprises Several practical solutions emerged. Ferguson argued that the apprenticeship levy should be reformed to cover wages, not just training costs, giving smaller enterprises the financial breathing space to bring in people who need time to develop. Athwal called for a culture change among large corporates and argued that government should, when awarding major contracts, hold suppliers to account for what they actually do to prioritise the social sector. Chair of the meeting Patrick Hurley noted that procurement officers routinely fail to use the powers already available to them under the Social Value Act, and signalled his intention to address this at national level in the coming months. The Skill Mill's Iciar Ania raised the importance of data. Her organisation works with young people who have offended, and has secured funding from the Youth Endowment Fund to run a randomised control trial across 22 areas but accessing data on employment and reoffending outcomes remains frustratingly difficult. Better data access, she argued, would help prove what works and unlock investment in what does. Cutting through all of it was a question about value. Not value for money in the narrow sense, but value in the broader sense - what society is actually willing to pay for. As Parfitt put it: "If it's just about price, it's a race to the bottom. We have to speak the language of value." He pointed to the Belu water on the table as a small but telling example: someone in procurement had chosen to spend more on water because the story behind it mattered. The ask from this group of leaders is not radical. They are not seeking permanent subsidies or special treatment. They want commissioning that reflects the true cost of supporting the hardest-to-reach, procurement that looks beyond the lowest price, and the kind of seed investment that allows proven models to grow. Done right, the returns - in reduced welfare dependency, improved wellbeing, and stronger communities  - would far outstrip the outlay. The evidence will contribute to recommendations in a final report to be published later this year.